Allegations of sexual-misconduct are everywhere; filling headlines, leading nightly news, and even transforming the political landscape. The never-ending deluge of accusations has left media elites, Hollywood celebrities, and Washington politicians in its devastating wake. Just last week three more well-known political leaders resigned as women came forward to accuse them of sexual-misconduct. Listening to news coverage leaves one wondering what, if any, are the moral implications of these events. So I thought I’d take a stab at it.

First of all, as Christians we must affirm that any sexual conduct outside God’s institution of marriage is forbidden by the Scriptures. As individual believers and as Christ’s church we need to stand upon the authority of the Bible in all matters of faith and practice. Every aspect of a person’s sexual life is to be reserved for the institution of marriage which according to the Scripture is the lifelong, monogamous union of a man and woman. The sexual-misconduct dominating the news reveals the brokenness of our world, and man’s rebellion to live within God’s moral boundaries.

The sexual-misconduct dominating the news reveals the brokenness of our world, and man’s rebellion to live within God’s moral boundaries.

Secondly, what we’re seeing here is the inevitable fallout of the sexual revolution that began in the 20th century when Western civilization faced incredible changes regarding sexuality and human behavior. Though we may be appalled by the horrible behavior of powerful men who abuse and exploit women we should not be surprised. The liberation from past social mores, so passionately sought by the feminist movement, is the very fuel that feeds the illicit passions that threaten the personal well-being and safety of women today. Of course, men are responsible for their own personal conduct, but the enormous sexual tension being thrust upon them from all sides has made the current problem inevitable.

Thirdly, it must be said that accusation without proof does not constitute sexual-misconduct. If merely being accused places someone’s career, family, or ministry in jeopardy then no one is safe. We live in an age where the allegation of sexual-misconduct has great power and can be used effectively to serve political interests. How much traction is given to these allegations is often determined more by politics than proof.

So it comes down to two conclusions:

1) In order to be considered credible, accusations of sexual misconduct must be accompanied with some measure of proof, whether it’s multiple witnesses or physical evidence. You may remember that it was Monica Lewinsky’s infamous blue dress that sealed the impeachment of former president Bill Clinton.

2) Those who are guilty should be punished. There are laws on the books and when these laws are violated, regardless of the person committing the crime, the courts have power to mete out justice and are responsible to do just that.

Finally, I’m not so sure simply resigning from office always serves the cause of justice. The courts are open, and those who’ve been victimized have legal recourse. It is very suspicious when that particular avenue is ignored and the case is thrown into the court of public opinion and manipulated by the liberal press. When a Bible-believing Christian with a proven record of outstanding moral character runs for office and is then blind-sided by specious accusations just before the election, I’m naturally distrustful. Such stories reek of political expediency. I take great comfort in the sovereignty of God and in knowing that he “will bring every deed into judgment, with every secret thing, whether good or evil.” (Ecclesiastes 12:14)